I have come to something of a watershed in my attitude towards identifying ‘ministries’ or ‘giftings’ in a way that allows us to tag individuals. I decisively dislike it. A fashionable preoccupation with blandly referring to the importance of the ‘fivefold ministry’ of Ephesians 4.11-13 as if such demarcation or identification were easy or even possible in our contemporary church is, I believe, at best facile and at worst dangerous. Too easily it encourages a secret agenda that is about status and power.
What really matters, says Paul later in that Epistle, is the pursuit of the imitation of Christ (Ephesians 5.1). I suspect this is better served today by speaking of fivefold ‘voices’, voices that reverbate with Christ centring, Scriptural emphases and practices. Be wary of stressing personal ‘ministries’ that we are to identify. Rather, let us listen for voices that carry the resonance of the voice and implement the message of our master, Jesus Christ.
I am guarded against any mindset that produces such questions as, ‘What is your ministry?’ I am far happier with a stress on relationality and servanthood, prizing the work of those who faithfully seeks to serve in whatever way they are released into within the body of Christ and in His name. It seems to me that God will take a man or woman with such an attitude and use them in any number of different ‘ministries’, in different places and at different times, as the needs of the occasion demand.
Certainly, give me someone to work with who seeks to be known as a ‘servant’ rather than recognised in their ‘ministry’ any day. Egos that accompany ‘ministries’ are hard not to trip over. I have to confess, I have become both wary and wearied by claims to charismatic anointing from individuals, sometimes meriting serious consideration but often, sadly, simply spurious. The floating of fanciful notions accompanied by proof texting, masquerading as Scriptural teaching, is neither honouring to God nor proves itself fit for equipping the saints.
If there are, as I believe there should be, differing and complementary ministries within the body of Christ that are to be recognised and affirmed, it should be on the basis of them being offered with servant hearts and in sincerity; but they should be properly assessed and where appropriate affirmed.
Within our Baptist Union, we specifically assess and affirm, through a thorough process, those recognised and accredited for a teaching, pastoral and oversight ministry. This process of identification has proven fit in affirming recognised ministries that serves both the local and wider church. We talk, in our Board of Ministry, of looking for indicators that bespeak ‘call, character, competency, conviction and conduct’. If these are fit criteria in assessing candidates for the church office of pastor, then they might happily be applied to any other offices that the local church feels it appropriate to identify and affirm for the pursuit and execution of its corporate ministry. Otherwise, let people be happy to be know and function as servants of the Lord. Is there a better title?
